We have the experience you need and won’t charge a fee unless we win. Call us today (201) 554-1208


Contact us today
If you feel that you are eligible to file a claim or you’d like information about how to handle your particular case, reach out to us today. Our dedicated team of lawyers will help guide you through the process and offer strong legal representation. Fill out the form or call (855) 973-5227.
Subpage - Contact Form

NJ Justices Weigh Applying DWI Warrant Rule Retroactively

Earlier this month, New Jersey’s highest court began deliberation over the Missouri v. McNeely ruling from 2013 made by the U.S. Supreme Court which had mandated that law enforcement would need a search warrant before drawing a blood or urine sample from drunk driving suspects. There is no word on how many past cases the decision would effect as the courts would apply the law retroactively.

As municipal law attorneys in Bergen County, NJ, we know it’s incredibly vital to make sure you are picking the right defense lawyer when your case involves a DUI or DWI. If you find yourself in need of a DUI or DWI defense lawyer, or have any questions, contact DeGrado Halkovich for your free consultation today at 201-678-9007.

NJ Justices Weigh Applying DWI Warrant Rule Retroactively

Source: NJ Law Journal

New Jersey’s highest court is considering whether to retroactively apply a 2013 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that said police generally must get a search warrant before obtaining blood samples or demanding urine samples from suspected intoxicated drivers.

The state Supreme Court on Dec. 3 heard arguments in a pair of cases—State v. Adkins and State v. Verpent—and is set to determine whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Missouri v. McNeely means that past police practices in the state, where warrants were rarely obtained, violated defendants’ constitutional rights if those defendants did not consent to providing the samples.

Justice Anne M. Patterson asked how many cases could be affected if McNeely were to be applied retroactively. Susswein said he had no hard figures but added that he suspected there were not that many cases involving blood samples to begin with.

To read this article in its entirety, click here.

© DeGrado Halkovich 2019

About Us
Terms & Conditions

Join our Mailing List

540 Hudson Street, 5th Floor Hackensack, NJ
201-554-1208 | win@degradolaw.com

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create,
and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The verdicts and settlements listed on this site are intended to be representative of cases handled by the DeGrado Halkovich LLC.
These listings are not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other claims